Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Edison Ambarzumjan vs S D Prajwal Dev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ambarzumjan vs Dev analysis and find out who is favored!
Edison Ambarzumjan vs S D Prajwal Dev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ambarzumjan 0 - 0 Dev
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ambarzumjan has won 49.34% of points on their second serve, while Dev has won 45.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ambarzumjan, in recent form, has won 51.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dev has won 53.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.24% and 34.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ambarzumjan has saved 66.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dev has saved 56.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ambarzumjan has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 21/ 16), with Dev winning 55.56% (W/L 30/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ambarzumjan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Dev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 101/ 101), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Ambarzumjan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16), where as Dev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.57% of matches (W/L 28/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ambarzumjan has played against opponents with an average rank of 60.81 while Dev has played against players with an average rank of 115.19.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ambarzumjan has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dev has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ambarzumjan has converted 40.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dev has converted 43.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
695
Rank
595
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
52% (44-41)
Career Total W/L
50% (144-146)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
45% (9-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Edison Ambarzumjan vs S D Prajwal Dev For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ambarzumjan VS Dev
Sportsbook
Offer
Ambarzumjan VS Dev H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Edison Ambarzumjan | S D Prajwal Dev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 45% (9/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (36/21) | 47% (20/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (316/276) | 49% (199/210) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (13/8) | 40% (4/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 50 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:51:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 53.08 | 162.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (601/1059) | 59% (749/1280) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (425/601) | 66% (498/749) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (226/458) | 46% (242/531) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (36/89) | 44% (66/151) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (394/1041) | 42% (565/1343) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (16/10) | 50% (7/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 17% (12/2) |
Edison Ambarzumjan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Maik Steiner
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
69 of
124)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
33 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(7) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Sina Moghimi
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Aaron Gil Garcia
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Rafael Ymer
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Pablo Trochu
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
112)
1
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(2) 7-6(3) 16-14 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
S D Prajwal Dev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Ryota Tanuma
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
10
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Daisuke Sumizawa
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Credit Chaiyarin
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(5) 6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adil Kalyanpur
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Luca Fantini
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve %
57%
(
13 of
23)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
21
Total Points Won
15
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
62%
(
76 of
122)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
35%
(
43 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Kazuma Kawachi
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Parth Aggarwal
39%
(
22 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicola Rispoli
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Ambarzumjan Vs Dev Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ambarzumjan are available here and Dev photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
